Local Support
Page last updated: 20-Dec-2007 Menu>
BARKING & DAGENHAM crucially mis-understand the meaning of section 437 of education act. expect to meet child and see work, HVs are normal practice and review every 6 months. expect to see structured education. very unfriendly agressive approach. March 06
BARNET
BARNSLEY
BATH AND NE SOMERSET
BEDFORDSHIRE mis quotes of law (wrong section)mis use of "broad and balanced" expectaton of monitoring expectaion of recorging of work. Misunderstanding of section 437 of 1996 ed act.
BEXLEY mentions "or otherwise" only in passing - no policy
BIRMINGHAM

Confuses EOTAS with EHE but has specific page under construction feb 07

BLACKBURN WITH DARWENTOP

assumes annual visits and access to child. Over emphasises importance of NC

BLACKPOOL

A guide for parents pdf file says that the Ed Act states that every child is "required" to attend primary school from the term followig their 5th birthday. As for Home ed info there is one Q in the FAQs of the welfare section that says "there is no law against it" & links to DfES. June 06

BOLTON think parents should fill in a "proposal to" HE form and an expectaion of regular monitoring
BOURNEMOUTH expects to see work, curricula and planning, uses the phrase broad & ballanced, says flexi schooling is ilegal beleive they have a duty to ensure all children in area have an education. Mis-states s437, expects regular reviews of inspection and wrongly states compulsory school leaving dates. states parents of children with statements must consult with LEA - all incorrectly. [May 06]
BRACKNELL FOREST
BRADFORD legally OK but very negative. displayes little understanding of the practicallities of HE.
BRENT lots of discussion about core corricula and SATs. expects forms to be filled in legally correct use of sect 437 but expects visits twice a year. a slight confusion about home tuition services and home education.
BRIGHTON & HOVE mis understands roll & expects regular monitoring. However local HE families report that they accept reports as opposed to visits. Feb 07
BRISTOL, CITY OF Expects regular monitoring, sight of childrens work and home visits May 06
BROMLEY Discouraging undertone, pushes to apply school requirements eg. hours and curriculum, assumes home visits: twice 1st year then annually. Feb 07
BUCKINGHAMSHIRE belief that most families follow NC, only a form for info - very little on website.
BURY TOP

Among the worst I've seen: Insist permission required to De-Register, home visits with child WILL be made by EWO + Advisor. Reason for choosing HE will be investigated, expects curricula, plans and record keeping. uses broad and balanced (May 06) and uses the title Education Othwise.[May 06]

CALDERDALE
CAMBRIDGESHIRE

discouraging. Asks you to inform them if you HE. Pushes home visits as the norm. Insists on discussion before de-reg of child with SEN. Asks for samples of child's work insists upon Broad and Balanced.

CAMDEN
CHESHIRE See Halton and Warrington)
CITY OF LONDON
CLEVELAND (See Hartlepool, Redcar & Cleveland, Middlesbrough & Stockton-on-Tees)
CORNWALL Limited but completely accurate info. Section 7 Ed Act 96 applies. No need to tell LEA, no qualifications needed. No permission required unless child in a special school. Phone number if you want further info. No booklet online though they do have hard copy. June 06
COVENTRY  
CROYDON another empty page
CUMBRIATOP
DARLINGTON Says EWO may call unannounced. Assumes at least annual home visits.
DERBY CITY Ask if child's never been to school that you inform LEA. Say need a broad and balanced curriculum that includes English, Maths and ICT. Suggests no alternative to annual home visits "to view the education being offered". June 06
DERBYSHIRE inform the LEA," school is best" says a Child Assessment may be made under the Children Act 1989 and they put a pressure to accept home visits with the child present. May 06
DEVON (See Plymouth & Torbay) Devon's notes are almost word for word same as Darlington: Says EWO may call unannounced. Assumes at least annual visits. On-line registration available.
DONCASTER Local HE groups have reported significant difficulties with Doncaster LEA particularly WRT autonomous education. They expect HVs, mistakenly think that education should be broad & balanced & undertake ongoing monitoring.
DORSET (See Bournemouth & Poole) Winner of the most incorrect web page -has an application form to apply to HE, Pushes to inform LEA, assumes home visits twice in 1st yr then annually with examples of work expected, Pushes NC!
DUDLEY Limited info, Assumes home visit by EWO and annually by Advisor Mis-leads towards school hours and tests Unclear about correct de-registration process
DURHAM (See Darlington)TOP
EALING Quite negative, infer it is costly and difficult and that school is preferable. Ask you to inform LEA if never been to school. Say you MUST tell LEA if your child has a Statement. Recommend NC and school hours. Pushes for home visits with child present. [June 06]
EAST RIDING OF YORKSHIRE Thinks that section 7 confirs a duty for the LEA to ensure all children receive an educaiton, assumes broad and balanced, lists subjects to be taught, appears to think that the parents have a duty to fullfill the provisions of a statement, assumes HVs, missunderstands section 437, assumes ongoing monitoring, think they have a duty to check, June 06
EAST SUSSEX Advises informing LEA, assumes home visits,expects Broad and Balanced the say little about their actual policy - it having been removed from the website but it used to say that they expected the child to be seen and assesment using , examples of work. 04-06
Enfield
ESSEX (See Southend-on-Sea & Thurrock)
GATESHEAD
GLOUCESTERSHIRE Assumes annual visits with access to child's work, pushes NC, says must inform LEA, On-line "proposal" from, asking for qualifications and 3 month plan and specifying subjects
GREENWICHTOP
HACKNEY Service run by the Learning Trust. confuses duties in section 437, pushes NC expects regular monitoring
HALTON
HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM
HAMPSHIRE Say EWO will visit to make "home circumstances report" and inspector will visit. Sells a "secondary school Home Education Pack".
HARINGEY Assumes annual visits and EWO "welfare" visit. Considers HE children should be tested for progress, Pushes to inform LEA, Much comparison to schools' duties
HARROW Generally discouraging. Pushes NC Says "should" inform LEA. Assumes home visits. Says hours "under instruction" should compare with schools'.
HARTLEPOOL
HAVERING tricky - look positive at a glance but: assume annual meeting with you and child, offers very prescriptive report forms, shows very schoolish eg of advisor report, issues annual photocard to identify as HE
HEREFORDSHIRE Misleading info re law about admission age that makes school appear compulsory
HERTFORDSHIRE seven succinct sentences saying sweet nothing - except: contact them for HE pack, EWO most likely visit home
HILLINGDON
HOUNSLOW a search will locate a PDF file that says: you should inform LEA who will notify school, says you must fill in their forms, assumes annual home visits, suggests school hours
HUMBERSIDE See East Riding of Yorkshire, Kingston-upon-Hull, North Lincolnshire, & NE Lincolnshire
ISLE OF WIGHTTOP

very limited info about who "monitors" HE

ISLES OF SCILLY
ISLINGTON
KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA
KENT & SUSSEX (See Medway)

Asserts a duty to monitor HE. Implies EWO and Consultant home visits. Says you "should" inform LEA, Implies school hours, Pushes NC Policy in practice varies throughout Kent.

KINGSTON UPON HULL, CITY OF
KINGSTON UPON THAMES
KIRKLEES link to Dfes parent centre only
KNOWSLEYTOP

Says must inform LEA. Asks for qualifications and daily timetable. Implies home visit with child present Implies no NC = disadvantage

LAMBETH
LANCASHIRE (See Blackburn with Darwen & Blackpool)
LEEDS

expects regular contact with parents, a broad &balanced curriculum, states what a good curriculum should look like, and gets the proceedure of section 437 wrong.May 06

LEICESTER CITY

Asserts a duty to monitor. Assumes home visit by EWO and inspector to discuss "request" for HE .

LEICESTERSHIRE Contact details of LEA person responsible only
LEWISHAM Asks you to inform the LEA. Assumes home visit by EWO and every two yrs by LEA officer. Pushes NC. Refers to repealed Ed Act 1993
LINCOLNSHIRE

Fair and accurate apart from a definition of education that includes
"following systematic instruction"

LIVERPOOL says child must attend school from 5.
LUTONTOP

limited info. Say you "should" speak to HE Officer to discuss options. Assumes home visit (to help plan your child's education).

MANCHESTER
MEDWAY

Asks you to inform LEA. Say you should offer English, Maths and ICT. Will request annual visit but mentions no alternative

MERTON
MIDDLESBROUGH
MILTON KEYNES Milton Keynes is widely regarded as an example of best practice, and currently enjoys very good relationships with the local HE community. Their policy, which properly conforms with statute, was formulated in close co-operation with local HEers and is published on their web site. [Oct 05]
NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE

"otherwise" option only mentioned in outline of SAO

NEWHAM
NORFOLKTOP

Incorrectly quotes law and even law that is no longer on the statute books. incorrectly uses the phrase "broad & balanced" and they incorrectly say that parents have a duty to inform the LEA however despite this, generally their policy is fairly accurate.

NORTH EAST LINCOLNSHIRE
NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE [hard copy] insists on home visits, implies curricula necessary, demands forms to be filled out, demands broad and balanced curricula, Wrong in many respects. It appears to be a draft document but is being sent to families in current form. [Jan 05]
NORTH SOMERSET

Assumes monitoring duty with minimum of annual visits with child present. Push certain types of evidence such as timetable, workbooks. Very negative about socialisation

NORTH TYNESIDE Very limited info with telephone contact details for more info.
NORTH YORKSHIRE (See York)

Claim EO closely involved in writing their guidance (unlikely). Assume at least annual home visits with child present and examples of work. Expect minimum of 3 core subjects from NC. Push for timetables and marking of work. Push to inform LEA.

NORTHAMPTONSHIRE wrongly uses the phrase broad and balanced, and spiritual and cultural development. erroneously states that qualifications are difficult to get, mis quotes section 437 and the law with respect to statement of special needs schools. May 2006
NORTHUMBERLAND Nothing other than assumption of home visit by EWO and Adviser. May not refer to Elective HE
NOTTINGHAM, CITY OF Very discouraging. Say it's important to inform LEA. Assume home visits to judge your education. Expect weekly timetable. Advise following NC.
NOTTINGHAMSHIRETOP

Says you should inform LEA. Expect Maths, English and ICT. Will request annual home visit - offers no alternatives.

OLDHAM
OXFORDSHIRE
PETERBOROUGH CITY out of date - new booklet available
PLYMOUTH, CITY
POOLE
PORTSMOUTH
READING
REDBRIDGE
REDCAR AND CLEVELAND
RICHMOND UPON THAMES link to EO web page
ROCHDALE
ROTHERHAM
RUTLANDTOP Draft for consultation now
SALFORD
SANDWELL Acknowledges right to HE
SEFTON brief ambiguous mention
SHEFFIELD
SHROPSHIRE (See Telford & Wrekin) massage to send for hard copy notes from office. Standard letter sent to families requiring home visits and evaluate against the national curriculum. All ultra vires.
SLOUGH
SOLIHULL
SOMERSET
SOUTH GLOUCESTERSHIRE The Yellow Book p137 has an incorrect procedure for deregistration and inspection. It is generally obstructive. Makes unreasonable demands of families re home visits - there is a local campaign among home educators to effect change in their policies. [July 05]
SOUTH TYNESIDE brief note and direction to LEA dept
SOUTH YORKSHIRE
SOUTHAMPTON
SOUTHEND-ON-SEA Expect to see the child, dated written work, HV - Oddly has a legal paper which contradicts their own policies.
SOUTHWARK requires permission from LEA to deregister, expects HVs, mis applies section 437, misunderstands the definition of a school, says flexi schooling is illegal, very discouraging. June 06
ST HELENS" color="#0000FF">TOP info page on HE but no online notes - compulsory visits implied
STAFFORDSHIRE Staffs assume home visits, say you need to inform the LEA, claim a duty to ensure children's safety and well being and deny deregistration on demand. May 06
STOCKPORT short notes - assumes home visit
STOCKTON-ON-TEES
STOKE-ON-TRENT
SUFFOLK
SUNDERLAND "mentioned in passing on ed social work services
SURREY

Limited info, mostly inaccurate. Completely wrong on HE with SEN.

SUSSEX see Kent
SUTTON
SWINDONTOP
TAMESIDE

Ask you to inform LEA. Push school hours and curriculum. Assume a duty to seek evidence. Assume home visits. Misinterpret Section 7 Ed Act '96

TELFORD AND WREKIN Wouldn't pass a KS1 "home ed law" test! Assume duty to monitor, minimum annual home visits, talk to child, samples of work. Imply school hours and "must" have "regard to" NC. Will compare child to school pupils. Ask you to inform LEA and to "ask" to de-register.
THURROCK contact for EOTAS
TORBAY

Says school is best. Say you should inform LEA. Push NC, structure and long-term plans. Assume meeting you and child every 6 months minimum. Mention suitable seating and lighting!

TOWER HAMLETS
TRAFFORD
WAKEFIELDTOP Quote S7 Ed Act 96, then say required by law to start school after 5th birthday. Misquote S437 to infer monitoring duty. Admit bias toward schooling. Recommend inform LEA. Assume meeting at home of LEA. Imply seeing child/egs of work.
WALSALL mention of EOTAS but doesn't let you open the link
WALTHAM FOREST
WANDSWORTH
WARRINGTON
WARWICKSHIRE

Very limited info but manage nonetheless to assume annual inspections and urge you to inform LEA.

WEST BERKSHIRE They ask you to discuss your decision with EWS, ask for a plan or weekly timetable, assume home visits and generally discourage HE. May 06
WEST SUSSEX
WESTMINSTER Policy under review
WIGAN avoid mentioning HE and mentioning attendance of registered pupils!
WILTSHIRE (See Swindon) "School Organisation Plan" and reference to a policy review doc only
WINDSOR AND MAIDENHEAD
WIRRAL
WOKINGHAM
WOLVERHAMPTON CITY
WORCESTERSHIRETOP EO regards Worcestershire as a flagship authority. their guidence is far from being the worst but there is an expectation that visits will take place. Also Worcestershire issues a record number of SAO's - 18 in 2004-5. [May 06]
YORK, CITY OF Very discouraging. Admit bias to schooling. Misquote S437 Ed Act'96 to infer duty to monitor. Will check annually. Say you need to inform LEA.
YORKSHIRE SEE NORTH,SOUTH, EAST  
BLAENAU (GWENT)
BRIDGEND
CAERPHILLY
CARDIFF
CARMARTHENSHIRE
CEREDIGION
CONWAY TOP
DENBIGHSHIRE
FLINTSHIRE
GWYNEDD
ISLE OF ANGLESY (MON)
MERTHYR TYDFIL
MONMOUTHSHIRE
NEATH & PORTH TALBOT
NEWPORT
PEMBROKESHIRE
POWYS
RHONDDA CYNON TAFF
SWANSEA
TORFAEN
VALE OF GLAMORGAN
WREXHAM TOP